|
SYS-CON.TV Webcasts
Comments
Did you read today's front page stories & breaking news?
SYS-CON.TV
|
Today's Top SOA Links
Enterprise Linux-Based Groupware
The choices
By: David Haas
Jul. 8, 2005 04:00 PM
In the IT world today, there are many reasons why Linux and other Open Source solutions can replace closed source products from Microsoft and other vendors. When it comes right down to it though, the software that's chosen in business is the software that provides the most value to the business.
On the server side, Linux's compelling business case rests on its ability to run on inexpensive hardware, its general stability and robustness, its low license fees, the large and growing number of applications that run on it, and the large number of vendors providing cost-effective support. On the client side, however, Linux still faces challenges, such as the scarcity of line-of-business productivity applications that run natively on the platform, and in particular, groupware. To succeed, Linux-based groupware offerings must provide at least the same level of business value that customers have come to expect from the offerings offered by the Windows platform.
Groupware Requirements The product should allow for sharing contact information including access and modification control. The ability to schedule meetings easily and effectively, including searching co-worker's calendars and tracking responses is required. The solution should be easy to use and present a familiar interface to the end user. Security and stability are paramount as companies deal with the ever-increasing flood of spam, e-mail viruses, and potentially the new requirements presented by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the United States. Finally, the solution should include a desktop client with off-line support that runs on both Windows and Linux, a Web client interface, and PDA synchronization. A Linux solution that fulfills these requirements will meet or exceed the business value of current Windows solutions.
Groupware Market Snapshot
It's no secret that Linux generally offers a lower software license cost than proprietary offerings. License cost is an important factor, but companies considering the switch to a Linux-based groupware alternative must consider more than just license fees. Additional costs companies will face with such a move include end-user retraining, labor costs for consulting services (research, implementation, support), potential new hardware purchases, and the impact that the migration will have while continuing to provide other IT functions. According to Microsoft's own estimates, it will cost approximately $150 per mailbox to upgrade from Exchange Server 5.5 to Exchange Server 2003. This cost typically includes Active Directory structure planning, new licensing fees, and new server hardware. According to the same estimates, it will cost approximately the same amount to migrate to a completely new system. Considering that all support for Exchange Server 5.5 terminates at the end of 2005 (except for security hot-fixes) the time is ripe for companies to consider alternatives to the forced upgrade. As more low-cost Linux offerings appear on the market that provide high-quality, robust, secure, and effective groupware functionality, another roadblock to Linux adoption on the desktop seems to be evaporating.
The Case for Cross-Platform Software In an interview, Shanthi Nair of Degree Controls, a Milford, NH-based electrical engineering firm, remarked, "First and foremost, satisfying the end user is the most important thing, and group calendaring functionality is critical. We used Exchange primarily for that feature. We are only interested in a low-cost solution that will enable all of our users, both Windows and Linux, to access this functionality."
Current Linux-Based Groupware Offerings
Web-Only Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1
Web 2.0 Latest News
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
|
SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
Most Read This Week
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||